![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
ICML 2009: Meeting Room 2 Session 42Theme: Health InformationTime:11.00-12.30
Going, going, gone... but not forgotten: lessons from a journal de-selection project Peter Morgan is Head of Medical & Science Libraries at Cambridge University Library, where he also directed the project that established its institutional repository. In the UK he was inaugural chairman of the University Medical School Librarians Group, has held office in other professional library organisations, and is currently a member of the Research Information Network's Consultative Group on Librarianship and Information Science. In Europe he has served as a UK representative on the EAHIL Council, and he has also worked for the British Council in Pakistan and Kuwait. Abstract:
Methods: (1) We targeted backsets of dead titles and monitored their in-library use, comparing the results with a similar review in 2000, to construct a list of low-use titles. (2) We checked these against electronic subscriptions and the holdings of other local libraries and created two lists: 444 unique titles for relocation to a dark archive, and 118 duplicated titles for disposal. (3) We conducted an extensive consultation exercise with our user community, using a web-based survey form to record their responses. Results: 7,700 users were invited to contribute to the consultation, and we received comments from fewer than 2%. Half the respondents were historians who objected in principle to our relocation plans for unique titles. After further investigation of alternative locations we modified our proposals, redirecting 77 titles to an accessible store, while the remainder were dealt with as originally proposed. Conclusions:
Google Books coverage of core clinical textbooks Head of Information Services at the J. Otto Lottes Health Sciences Library, University of Missouri - Columbia, USA. Graduate of University of Minnesota. Distinguished member of Academy of Health Information Professionals, Medical Library Association. Abstract:
Objective: To determine the extent of coverage of core medical textbooks in Google Books search. Methods: ISBNs for the recommended core clinical titles from the 2003 Brandon-Hill List will be searched in Google Books to see if each is available. Titles that are listed in Google Books will further be classified as to whether the text is freely available for viewing; whether only a limited text preview is available; or searchable with no preview available. If a new edition has been published since the 2003 Brandon-Hill list, the same information will be gathered for the most recent edition. Results: Will provide statistics on the availability for all books, for each medical specialty, and for latest editions. Conclusions: In addition to providing information on overall inclusion and coverage extent of core clinical texts, the data gathered will provide insight into questions like these: Is there a difference in availability between 2003 editions and current editions? Are books from certain medical specialties or publishers more likely to be included in Google Books?
Dissemination of Health Information through ERMED Electronic Journal Consortium in India Director, National Medical Library, India. M.Sc.,Ph.D. Diploma (French), Diploma (Computer Sci). Published 4 books (individual authorship) & 27 papers. Attended and presented paper in last 9th ICML in Brazil. Personal website: www.scientistindia.com. ERMED electronic journal coordinator: www.nmlermed.in. Abstract:
Assessing the impact of electronic journals in the faculty of Veterinary Science at the University of Zimbabwe Jesten Marufu is the Veterinary Science Librarian at The University of Zimbabwe.He holds a Bachelor of Science Honours Degree in Library and Information Science.He has 5 years experience as a Librarian Abstract:
Objective: Assess the impact that electronic journals have had to the Faculty of Veterinary Science. The impact is assessed on both staff and students who are the primary targets of the e-journals. Methodology: Use of well structured questionnaires to be completed by a randomly selected number of students and staff will provide the needed information. Also, the use statistics of the electronic journals will be used to measure their impact. Result: A clear indication of the usefulness of the electronic journals to their target market. Conclusion: The paper exposes some of the reasons why electronic journals can fail to have an impact on their target market. This is then calls for libraries to address these shortcomings so that the rich and up to date information in electronic journals can be used fully.
|
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||